penfield: Dogs playing poker (Default)
[personal profile] penfield
"I don't pick subjects as much as they pick me."
- Andy Rooney


There are some things in life that we just have to deal with, despite our sneaking suspicions or better judgment. Medical care, for example: we have to trust that these trained professionals know what they're doing, and that there's a valid scientific reason why they need to grab my nuts and ask me to cough. (This is either a folksy method for diagnosing a hernia or an ages-old hazing ritual for young doctors.)

Or your cable bill. No reasonably intelligent, right-minded person would or could discern the appropriate rate or rationale for the Communications Sales Tax or the FCC Regulatory Fee or the "Rights of Way Use" assessment, but we pay it because the alternative is getting your Comedy Central and American Movie Classics from a swarthy Kazakhstani paraprofessional named Clamp.

But I want to talk about expiration dates: those vaguely authoritative dates stamped on all manner of food stuffs from breakfast cereal to after-dinner mints. I keep coming around to the hypothesis that many of these expiration dates are total bullshit.

Some of these dates are beyond debate, if not beyond reproach. Expiration dates for dairy products are given the benefit of the doubt, as are those for packaged meat. I am inclined to trust organic items (i.e. items without preservatives), items that require refrigeration and open items prone to growing stale. I will even concede wisdom on most canned goods, after a particularly enlightening experience with a three-year-old can of garbanzo beans, which upon opening gave off the distinct aroma of Uranium-231.

(Pharmaceuticals are sort of a gray area. I confess to being a liberal arts major and passing too many notes during high school chemistry class, and I have no idea whether the expiration dates on pill bottles represent the beginning of a general fade in efficacy or if they undergo some sort of time-release mutation that will totally invert my hormones or something. I find that my personal fear of pharmacological metamorphosis is inversely related to my need for pain or symptom relief.)

Some items, however, really stretch my trust. I have a package of dry angel hair pasta in my pantry with a supposed expiration date of August 2004. Am I supposed to believe that this pasta will no longer properly absorb boiling water? Or if it does, it will somehow reconstitute as some sort of poison? Grape Nuts, the only breakfast cereal tough enough to survive a nuclear holocaust, supposedly comes with a one-year time limit, after which -- who knows -- it will taste even more like gravel? A box of croutons -- that is, intentionally dried and stale chunks of bread -- is apparently a ticking time bomb.

Okay, these items could conceivably contain derivatives or byproducts of actual perishable material, whatever that means. But the one that bothers me most is bottled water. Good lord in Heaven, how the hell does water go bad? Does it start to shed hydrogen atoms or something? Does it turn into wine? Is it just not as wet? God dammit.

We don't really who is responsible for these imprints. I gather it's not the FDA, or else it would be included in their designated nutritional summary box. I don't think it's the grocer, since the practical labor required for such an undertaking -- to say nothing of the actuarial calculations -- would be commercially prohibitive. That leaves us with the manufacturer, whose motives are questionable. Not only am I given to the assumption that these dates are derived from the calculus of minimally acceptable levels of legal liability, I am cynical enough to believe that the expiration dates are artificially deflated, just to get us to throw out the old shit and buy more new shit.

Which would be nothing less than despicable. But also brilliant.

I agree

Date: 2008-09-02 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jatchwa.livejournal.com
I mean, come on! Tylenol? How could it expire? It's a power!

I add one (or two) years to the expiration dates on all medicines in my house. They're OBVIOUSLY still good.

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-02 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] arealariel.livejournal.com
With meds, they claim that they start to lose efficacy after the expiration date. I also generally go by the 1-2 year rule. A very memorable moment in my life, however, was when I was in college and offered to clean out my grandma's medicine cabinet. There were med bottles in there older than me at the time and there was one over-the-counter med in particular that she had several bottles of, well past expired that she really didn't want me to toss since it was "such a good drug". I had to secretly toss those bottles and did so without remorse since all of the pills in the bottles had congealed into one mass of crystallized solid. Kind-a scary. I guess those pills showed the extreme of how meds breakdown over time and are probably less effective (especially after 10-20 years). But I am sure you can still get an extra year or two out of most of them.

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-08 02:46 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hey hey!!!!

The technical definition of the exipiration date of a drug is: the date beyond which, when stored under proper conditions, the potency of the drug is no longer guaranteed within 90% of the stated strength. Waoo, that was a mouthful. Drugs do degrade, usually in a harmless way. USUALLY.

BUT! A word to the wise for you Tylenol hoarders: Tylenol can POTENTIALLY degrade into a compound that is actually very toxic to your body (as is, Tylenol is pretty rough on the liver), so it's very prudent to toss out the old stuff. A few months to a even year past expiration? It's all probably still good. Anything further than that ... wouldn't think of risking it, actually.

And that is all for now. :)

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-08 04:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enchanted-pants.livejournal.com
Thank you, mysterious pharmacology expert. If you are who I think you are, then you need to tell me your e-mail address, because I think I have the wrong/old one. That, or you haven't replied to my e-mails in like three years.

Nobody solves a problem like you.

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-08 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jatchwa.livejournal.com
Years from now, I'm going to be considering throwing out some Tylenol and I'll think, "I think I heard somewhere that you should always throw out Tylenol," and I'll do it as if I read it in the New England Journal of Medicine and not from an anonymous stranger in a blog comment.

For years, I talked about some theory of dream analysis that I was positive was legitimate until I learned its source: Dr. Frasier Crane of the Bull & Finch Pub, Boston. I'd been quoting sitcom writers for 10 years.

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-10 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] village-twins.livejournal.com
Josh, you see, reads the New England Journal of Medicine as often as he reads blogs. So the two sources are easily confused.

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-10 07:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jatchwa.livejournal.com
I read the New England Journal of Medicine whenever they publish an editorial in support of our bill. So, like, once a year.

PS -- http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/10/1056

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-10 07:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] village-twins.livejournal.com
Once per year? I guess I misspoke, then. Here's what I should have typed: "Josh, you see, reads the New England Journal of Medicine as often as he writes blog posts."

Re: I agree

Date: 2008-09-21 08:52 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
damn right no one solves a problem like me. ;)

i started a page on here, but i don't think i've written ANYTHING yet. think it's about time to rectify that.

nespeculate@yahoo.com


and I am as good as the New England Journal of Medicine, so quote away. :P
Page generated Jan. 19th, 2026 08:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios